User talk:Asa01

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Asa01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Zanimum

Contents

[edit] Sources for John Deeks

Hello, good work on John Deeks, and thanks for the contribution. However, you forgot to add any references to the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. What websites, books, or other places did you learn the information that you added to John Deeks? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? Thank you very much. - SimonP 05:09, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Christmas

Actually, as it happens, the Russians celebrate it in January [1] ;) Morwen - Talk 23:53, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Yeah I was originally going to take out the reference to December, but then realised I might be being a little hasty, so left it in. However I forgot to change my comment.
Fair enough ;) I notice the article doesn't actually mention that - but not sure what other countries keep that calendar. Morwen - Talk 00:35, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] TV

Hi mate, noticed your work on John Deeks among other things. Drop us a line re TV presenters/voiceovers. Rogerthat 13:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Great job!

I went to revert User:In Name And Blood's edits, and saw you've already all of them! :) —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-20 08:12Z

Thanks re User:In Name And Blood. He put a lot of work into that didn't he? His earlier edits (Rowan Stewart, filmmaker) seem dodgy too. Asa01 08:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Yup, I already nominated Rowan Stewart and Echoes Of Grace for deletion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rowan Stewart)  :) —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-20 08:19Z

[edit] Wow!

Hey - quick work dabbing The Dismissal (television series)! I was about to do it myself and couldn't work out how come those articles supposedly linked to The Dismissal but were already linked to The Dismissal (television series) when I tried editing them... Thanks! Regards, CLW 08:45, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Yeah I noticed the merge had occured so just changed the linking to pages. Then I realised the merge had just happened minutes before, so I hope I wasn't loking you out when you were trying to update the linking-to pages! Asa01 08:47, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Number 96 shot of Nigel Arnold and Jaja.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Number 96 shot of Nigel Arnold and Jaja.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:10, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] broadcasted

I think if you do a web search or look up a dictionary you will find 'broadcasted' is a word. --ozzmosis 03:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Ooops sorry so it is! Gee it just sounds wrong to me. Thanks for the message. Asa01 04:07, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Straw poll on the infobox

Hi, I don't know if you haven't noticed the message on the BB06 talk page, or if you've chosen not to vote, or whatever; but if you have missed it, there's a straw poll taking place on this page, about whether the infobox should have colours going right through the rows, or whether colours should just be on the side, in one box. If you want to vote, then feel free. And if you don't, then feel free as well, I guess. Anyway, just letting you know about it in case you didn't know already. --JD[don't talk|email] 23:37, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ste4k

(copied over from my talk page)

Though it is hardly the most important article, I thought her attempted AfD of Big Brother (Australia series 6) [[2]] was pretty outrageous, and clearly misinterpreted the policies quoted in the AfD (Like, sure the contestants on the show are not notable in themsevles, but the article is not about those individuals, it is about an actual television show, and most TV shows have acticles.) This AfD came after lots of lengthy arguments conducted on that article's talk page. Asa01 04:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
I completely agree. That was the AfD that first brought ste4k to my attention. It was a blatantly inappropriate nomination, but every time I discussed it with her she refused to listen to what I was saying, instead replying with things like "Please see WP:VER, thanks." Her behavior has certainly not improved since then. You may be interested in commenting on an RfC on her behavior that is being prepared at User:Will Beback/Sandbox. Thanks. --Nscheffey(T/C) 02:00, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Entry for Philippa Baker

Hi,

I'm not sure that I'm doing this right, but I'm trying to contact Asa01. As far as I can tell, you are the author of the entry on Philippa Baker, Australian actor from Number 96.

Philippa Baker is my mother. I do not doubt that your entry is correct, but there are some details that my mum doesn't remember.

I wondered if you could tell me your source for saying she and Johnny were written out of Number 96 at the end of 1974? She doesn't recall this, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen. If I knew where you got that information, I could judge how accurate it is likely to be.

My email address is amanda-wiki at gormand com au

Thanks,

Amanda Hickie 220.233.81.113 09:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cashed Up Bogan

Why does this have its own page? We already have bogan which surely is enough?

Furthermore, I have said in that article's talk page, this page seems highly dodgy. Wikipedia should not have original research and stuff should be verified. In this case it seems that it is the one external reference that is engaging in the original research: The Age chatted to a single marketing guy who went on about the concept of cub. Whether the cub really is a notable, new, or specific phenomenon is not coroborated by that article. The article just reprints one person's opinion. Furthermore there is no coroboration that any other marketing people believe in the concept, or if anyone else uses the term at all. So wikipedia is reproducing someone else's original research, but presenting that original research as fact. Asa01 21:11, 17 July 2006 (UTC)


G'Day Asa01,

I've seen that marketing research featured in an article in The Sydney Morning Herald also. It was also used to describe Shane Warne in another Herald article recently. But these are not the only places that the term has been used lately. I've seen it used on a number of blogs/forums, magazine articles and even on The Chaser's War on Everything TV show.

I don't feel passion for the article remaining. Maybe it is enough to include it in the Bogan article. I suppose you might think differently when it appears in the next edition of the Macquarie dictionary. J Bar 23:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chuck Cunningham

Thanks for letting me know. I've redeleted it and protected the page. Nandesuka 03:27, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Carmen Duncan

Thanks, the Carmen Duncan article needed a good picture! Did she appear on Number 96 before Australian TV switched to color? I was wondering why it was in black and white (in the US, we switched to color in the mid-1960s). Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 17:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] (List of) unseen character(s)

Thanks. I had intended to AfD it, but was surprised to see that there was actually a not-bad article buried under that list. Kind of a pleasant surprise. :) —tregoweth (talk) 06:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Easties and Westies

Hi Asa. Would you support the deletion of both Easties and Westies? Both articles are magnets for derogatory comments. --WikiCats 04:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Code Brown

LOL, I liked the code-brown part of the article too! it wass funny! LOL! Kitler005 16:08, 5 September 2006 (UTC) 16:08, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Shrimp vs. prawns

Actually they are different groups of species. See shrimp and prawn. But usually a cuisine will only use one term, despite whether shrimp or prawns are being referred to. Grouse 20:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

That's why I didn't adjust your edit :) --Grouse 23:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bogan List

Hi. On the Bogan talk page you express strong disapproval at the plethora of original reseearch in the bogan list; further, you advocate removing all original research. Do you think any of the purported traits should remain? If so, which ones? I will delete the whole list unless someone makes an argument for any particular item remaining. Rintrah 10:18, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Question

Are you a UK Ex-Pat at all? I'm just wondering because you seem to know a fair bit about Family Affairs. Conquistador2k6 27 October 13:50

[edit] Carry on at your convenience / Brighton Palace Pier

Hi, I see you've been improving the Carry On At Your Convenience article, and I wanted to ask you about one of your changes.

When referring to the Pier's rifle range seen in the film, the article used to say that this feature was not known to be portrayed anywhere else - I wrote that in fact, and have been hunting for any other source ever since I saw the film and was intrigued. There is evidence on the pier itself of some support structure down there, and of some steps, but these could just as easily have belonged to an access way. Certainly the feature was gone by the time I moved to Brighton in 1990. But I see you've changed the article to say, "a feature that did not exist in reality", and I'd love to know if you know that for sure, perhaps from having been there around the date of the filming, or from a source relating to the film, or if you just meant to say "a feature which no longer exists". If there is a source, we could add it to the article as a reference. If not, I'd prefer to revert it to a less categorical statement.

Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this. :) – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 22:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Hello! I am sorry to say that I have no special knowledge of the pier... I am in Australia not the UK (I have been to the UK, but not to Brighton.) The only reason I changed it was because I was trying to clarify the meaning. I thought (it seems, incorrectly) that the editor was trying to say that the film shows something that doesn't exist in the real structure (something films do all the time). So no special knowledge of the pier here. A check of the intricately detailed book The Carry On Companion by Robert Ross yields no further information in this regards. I have no problems with you reverting the text to what it was. (That is of course Larry Martyn from Are You Being Served in the rifle range.) Asa01 00:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for replying – okay, I'll restore it (and think about better ways to word it so that it's more clear.) – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 12:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Family Affairs project

It seems as if we're the only two who actually give/gave a stuff about this great show. What say we have a proper bash at it? I've been reading pages Charnham station on the internet archive and racking my brains for accurate character info. Conquistador2k6 4 December 2006 23:00 (UTC)

Yes I think it was an interesting show (The Hart's demise) and later episodes were well-made and well written. Due to a sometimes busy schedule I haven't followed all storylines. It is still screening on cable here but I have not seen an episode since Graham Harker. Some events I know about but others I don't. But I will tidy up and add info here and there. I do not have too much behind the scenes info. Asa01 03:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Film comment

Dear Asa01. You removed a section from snuff films about "I spit on your grave". You are correct, that this isn't a snuff film. However, a very small-budget piece from Wisconsin spoofing this movie's title with their title "I spit on your grave, I piss on your corpse" sometimes categorized in movie stores by only the first half of the title does fictionalize a Snuff Film. It is extremely hard to find, you would probably never find "I spit on Your corpse, I piss on Your grave" at Blockbuster, but it is a ficticious snuff-type film. LDHLontz 14:00, 14 September 2006 (UTC)LDHLontz

[edit] Conspicuous consumption

You added a very appropriate link to Conspicuous consumption. It reminds me of the now almost defunct cult of bling-bling. Rintrah 08:24, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Nouveau riche is of course the old term for what are now renamed Cashed Up Bogans by marketing people. Mx can hardly print an article about the subject of "Nouveau riche" - that's old - but luckily there's a new name for exactly the same thing, so they can print an article using the new name as if the concept is something new (along with pics that keep their advertisers happy and rich). Asa01 10:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Strayan

  • I thought I would just explain that the "cultural cringe" comment was meant to be an example of deadpan humour. Your magnificent volume of contributions especially to the improvement of articles on Australian cultural ephemera clearly shows that you are not a cringer. Cheers Albatross2147 12:24, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:John Orcsik in Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:John Orcsik in Number 96.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 17:34, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Death of a Salesman: The Jayne Mansfield starrer

Can you lend a hand in dredging up something about the Jayne Mansfield theater performance of Death of a Salesman (probably in 1953), and add to Death of a Salesman#On Stage? May be you can lead the redlink on Jayne Mansfield#Notable theater performances to that update as well. Please, respond to my talk page. Thank you. Aditya Kabir 06:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Box 43.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Box 43.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:N96 mummy.JPG

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:N96 mummy.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:N96 mummy and daddy macdonald.JPG

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:N96 mummy and daddy macdonald.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:N96 maggie.JPG

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:N96 maggie.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:N96 aldo roma 01.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:N96 aldo roma 01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:N96 Roma and Aldo.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:N96 Roma and Aldo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Number96 9.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Number96 9.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Number96 61.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Number96 61.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Number96 32.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Number96 32.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Number96 25.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Number96 25.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:N96 Liz Jaja.JPG

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:N96 Liz Jaja.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:36, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:No96 327.jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:No96 327.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:41, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Where did you go?

Hey. Just curious. You weren't around for a good 4 months. Where were you? Conquistador2k6 27 July 2007 22:16 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Number 96 Wendy Blacklock as Mummy.JPG

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Number 96 Wendy Blacklock as Mummy.JPG. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 14:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Jayne Mansfield

The article on Jayne Mansfield, that you helped greatly to improve has been up for peer review. Many improvements were suggested, and I managed to address a few of those issues. But, without your help the article is getting stagnant. The biggest problem still lies with style and citations. Please, take a look that review here. I really believe that the time is ripe for the article to become at least a good article, if not an feature article, with your help. Aditya(talk • contribs) 05:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please, advise

Since you have helped the Jayne Mansfield article to become what it is today, I'd like to draw your attention to another article split off from the main one - Jayne Mansfield in popular culture. It has been nominated for deletion a second time here, and the supports so far are three way - "Delete", "Keep" and "Merge" - with a few comments thrown in (mostly by the nominator and I). Would you take a look at the debate and the article? Even if you stay away from voicing your view on the debate page, you can advise me on my talk page (may be lend a hand, too). I hope I am not canvassing :P. Aditya(talk • contribs) 14:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Deborah Gray and Frances Hargreaves in a scene from Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Deborah Gray and Frances Hargreaves in a scene from Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Abigail as Bev in Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Abigail as Bev in Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Justine Saunders in a scene from Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Justine Saunders in a scene from Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Patrick Ward in Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Patrick Ward in Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:N96 Liz Jaja.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:N96 Liz Jaja.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:N96 aldo roma 01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:N96 aldo roma 01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:N96 maggie.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:N96 maggie.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rebecca Gilling in Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rebecca Gilling in Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sonia Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sonia Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thelma Scott and James Condon in Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thelma Scott and James Condon in Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thelma Scott as Claire and Abigail as Bev in Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thelma Scott as Claire and Abigail as Bev in Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Carol Raye as Amanda in Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carol Raye as Amanda in Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Candy Raymond in Don's Party.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Candy Raymond in Don's Party.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Carlotta in Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carlotta in Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Carmen Duncan as Helen Sheridan in Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carmen Duncan as Helen Sheridan in Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:03, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Edie and Lucy in Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Edie and Lucy in Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gordon McDougall as Les in Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gordon McDougall as Les in Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:James Elliott as Alf Sutcliff in Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:James Elliott as Alf Sutcliff in Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Number 96 shot of Nigel Arnold and Jaja.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Number 96 shot of Nigel Arnold and Jaja.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Number96 13.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Number96 13.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Number96 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Number96 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Number96 25.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Number96 25.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Number96 27.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Number96 27.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Number96 32.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Number96 32.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 01:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Number96 61.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Number96 61.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 01:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Cleaning up the List of disaster films

Asa...At one time you showed some interest in the List of disaster films. I was wondering if you would be interested in coming back and discussing all the clean up that needs to be done to it? - LA @ 02:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sheila Kennelly as Norma in Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sheila Kennelly as Norma in Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:25, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Elaine Lee as Vera in Number 96.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Elaine Lee as Vera in Number 96.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Elaine Lee as Vera in the Number 96 movie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Elaine Lee as Vera in the Number 96 movie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dina Mann on the set of Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dina Mann on the set of Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:James Elliott as Alf Sutcliff in Number 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:James Elliott as Alf Sutcliff in Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:56, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:No96 327.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:No96 327.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mark Hashfield and Abigail and Tom Oliver in a scene from Number 96 .jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Mark Hashfield and Abigail and Tom Oliver in a scene from Number 96 .jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Malcolm Thompson in Number 96.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Malcolm Thompson in Number 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)