Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Holocaust of Gaza

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  1. An armed conflict between two armies Hamas and the IDF: You can not describe Hamas army, this is a breach of neutrality.
  2. Trained and armed by Iran: This is also a breach of neutrality, there is no conclusive evidence to prove it.
  3. There is no record of genocide: I can bring a list of Palestinian civilians were killed by Israeli forces, including 26 children.
  4. There is a relatively minor injuries on both sides: Yes, very slight injuries up to more than 200 wounded in hospitals in Egypt, and others in hospitals in Gaza, and died because at least 9 people on the Palestinian side. you still call it slightly?!
  5. From talking about the Iranian newspaper: This is the article in the Arabic version of Wikipedia, interpretation and translation mechanism, and there is no Iranian sources or Syria in the Arabic version of> & athoer editor add Iranian source (read date of the article can to make sure).

Finally, I would like to say that you demonstrated myth en.wikipedia real, which we regard as an ideal model in the Arabic version of Wikipedia, but I found it a platform for the ideas and beliefs of certain, and never hear the other opinion, do what Brownie --Statros (talk) 19:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

1. You're right, Hamas isn't an army, they are terrorists who compelled Israel to defend its citizens which has unfortunate results for some Palestinians.
2. Just because the Mossad and CIA doesn't tell you doesn't mean there is no conclusive evidence.
3. Palestinians who were unfortunately killed because their government couldn't prevent terrorists from using them as human shields doesn't constitute genocide according to any definition of the word.
4. Compared to Holocaust which was coined to describe an event in which six million were killed, the numbers are small indeed.
5. unintellegible Keyed In (talk) 20:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Your own views, Keep it to yourself. --Statros (talk) 21:32, 14 March 2008 (UTC)