Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:42, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Woos

Woos (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Delete per WP:NOT(Wikipedia is not a dictionary) and possibly per WP:NEO. Walton monarchist89 17:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - neologism. – Tivedshambo (talk) 17:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete for goodness sake. Nonsense. -- RHaworth 18:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

  I could have done a speedy delete but I thought it was coherent enough to be given a chance - where there's any doubt I always prefer AfD to speedy, as I think it gives articles a chance at improvement. However, as it stands it's in clear violation of WP:NEO. Walton monarchist89 18:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. However, contrary to what Rhaworth said, this isn't nonsense. J Milburn 20:25, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Oh, yuck. Get rid of it now. Should have been titled "wooing," I assume, but still just a dicdef.--N Shar 23:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.