Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Winnicks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 07:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Winnicks
I believe this page is a hoax, as I cannot find any references to winnicks. It may just be a regional non-notable term. Absurdist 18:01, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sounds like nonsense. Even if this was true, it would likely be a non-notable regional term. Spellcast 19:03, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Article has no sources and does not assert notability. --Hdt83 Chat 19:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete would be a better option for this garbage. Jauerback 19:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete seems hoaxy. Not that this is a great reference, but it would suggest Winnicks are something else entirely! Eliz81 21:41, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per Jauerback. Gahhhh ... utter nonsense. Blueboy96 21:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing in Google Books that isn't the last name of someone. Made-up but false is not the same as nonsense and is not speedy-eligible. Speedy isn't there for stuff you want to get rid of more quickly. --Dhartung | Talk 01:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Unless someone has access to the English Dialect Dictionary to prove that this word does exist, consensus obviously endorses the opinion that this is a hoax article. Even if the EDD verifies the existence of a dish with that name, the bit about how they were "often prepared in an old fashioned Fenland dwelling known as a 'Tatty heap'" & that this is a one-off edit, leads me to conclude that this was a joke, & if not deleted moved to WP:BJAODN. -- llywrch 19:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete per nonsense.--JForget 14:55, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

