Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William charles "will" connell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Hermione1980 23:07, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] William charles "will" connell

Asserts notability and imfamy, google disagrees. Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 01:43, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Now on the lam- article gone- didn't see the need to revert. --JJay 02:57, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• comment the articel was improperly blanked, I have reverted, and in the process removed the now inappropriate speedy tag. DES ^(talk) 03:34, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ifnord 11:15, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Attack page. Clusty never heard of such a criminal meaning online newspaper haven't either. Unverifiable. - Mgm|^(talk) 14:54, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Either inaccuracies and vanity on the part of Mr. Connell or one of his friends, or an attack on his character by someone else. Either way, non-notable. --Icarus 21:32, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as an obvious whack job. Jtmichcock 05:40, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, CSD:A6, attack page. Anyone? MCB 18:12, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.