Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiDegree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. TigerShark 11:30, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] WikiDegree

Non-noteable (1 Google hit) and self-referential. An interesting concept but not a real one. Alex S 19:06, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, per the arguments in the nomination. Thue | talk 19:25, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. hateless 19:26, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. No verification in the article that this even exists. Agent 86 20:08, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism.Gerry Ashton 20:10, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Invitatious 22:07, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. Cedars 02:01, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, The term is used at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Free_Market_Wikiversity#Value_of_a_WikiDegree. The meaning is slightly

different but intent is the same. . User:Klnorman 08:00, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Starionwolf 23:04, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Finally, I personally did not invent this term. I found it at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Free_Market_Wikiversity#Value_of_a_WikiDegree While it may be a neologism, so is Wikipedia. I think that it is an important , emerging idea. You can delete here but, you can't kill the idea.

• Delete This is a futuristic concept yet to come into being. Whether it is notable or self-referential or not, it is also currently doesn't exist as anything more than a concept, so WP:NOT a crystal ball. —WAvegetarian•(talk) 07:19, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.