Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebRidesTV

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted + Salted --JForget 01:26, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WebRidesTV

WebRidesTV (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:WEB. Article was created multiple times by several WP:SPA accounts[1], with no other edits other than related to "WebRidesTV" . Was speedied four times as Webridestv under WP:CSD#A7 and once under its current incarnation per WP:CSD#G11. Has a few links but they seem to be merely self published or trivial coverage and mentions. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. which is clearly noted in the notability guidelines. Google doesnt turn up much either[2]. Seems to be nothing more than Self-promotion and product placement, which wikipedia is WP:NOT. Hu12 (talk) 01:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - obvious WP:SPAM. It appeared that the most significant coverage according to the article was "An article was written about the site on the UnitedSteelFactory website [8]...", when really it was about a 1932 Ford Roadster. Salt may be an option. I forsee the recreation of this article again if this gets deleted. Jauerback (talk) 02:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as spam, no reliable sources to be seen. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:47, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:N and WP:SPAM. Billscottbob (talk) 03:52, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete -- press mentions found with Google News' archive search: just one 61-word blurb in the Atlanta newspaper. "Tread Hunter Magazine" reference cited in article is inadequate. Zero press = zero notability = no reliability = no article. Extra points off for spamming. --A. B. (talk) 04:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and salt Spam, fails WP:WEB, no serious press coverage, Wikipedia is not a web directory. szyslak 09:41, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Pass the WP:SALT please. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 20:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and salt. per my nom. On a side note, it appears a newlly created account, Cal40, is canvassing the participants in this AFD.--Hu12 (talk) 04:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.