Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viva Los Penios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted as G1. Ryanjunk (talk) 20:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Viva Los Penios

Viva Los Penios (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non notable neoglism. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Prod was removed by an anonymous editor with the comment "This is a valid article. Terms such as "pwn" which are not in a dictionary have pages too". J Milburn (talk) 11:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete As per policy. Ryanjunk (talk) 18:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Borderline patent nonsense - we understand that the authors made this word up, but it's sure as hell never going to belong in an encyclopedia.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 19:26, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

• Also 0 ghits apart from Wikipedia for a web-based topic with false claims of notability, which have been determined to be lies, making it a G3 candidate for blatant misinformation - it's surely not widely used. I think it's time to apply the WP:SNOW and close this now.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 19:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.