Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visible.net

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete per G11 - Spam and A7 - Non-notable web. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 05:55, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Visible.net

Visible.net (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This article has no outside sources and fails to establish notability. DerRichter (talk) 22:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

It does have one source, the google checkout one. It appears as though its newer, looks less bare than some corp. pages ive seen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.103.176.58 (talk) 22:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. There is no assertion of notability here, so it could probably be speedy deleted. The Google link doesn't actually mention visible.net. The site has been up only 3 weeks, so maybe notability will come later, but it isn't there yet. Kevin (talk) 23:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment Creator's username shows a pretty clear COI. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Are you sure? There's no dot before the 'n'. :-) Kevin (talk) 05:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable spam article fail WP:Corp and WP:WEB Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment Hi, I am the original publisher. Wanted to assure you all that this listing is in no way intended as spam, just want to show off our corporate brand on the infamous Wikipedia. I recently added more references and hopefully added more 'notability'. I also cleared up some of the text references that might not have been clear, like the checkout reference and added the pubcon one. Yes, the site is new, however if the page remains, I pledge to continue improving it to be more in line with your ideas of notability and authority. We are making a lot of changes and are sure to be covered during at least some. I want to know if there's anything I can do more to keep the page active and to become more notable. I am newer to Wikipedia, so any help would be great, got to start somewhere. Also, a log upload and screenshot would be a nice addition, however i do not have the privileges, otherwise i would have included those as well. i also plan on adding some notable clients we have, with their permission of course. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.103.176.58 (talk) 16:40, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Please read WP:NOT. Showing off a corporate brand is not what Wikipedia is for. --DerRichter (talk) 22:40, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.