Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Rivals (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 03:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Urban Rivals

Urban Rivals (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Since its last deletion, article still does not demonstrate how the subject is notable per WP:N guidelines. I've found one possible reliable review here but multiple sources are required. Marasmusine (talk) 08:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep This might be able to be kept through cleanup. There are some sources out there, explained in the last AFD. STORMTRACKER 94 ^{Go Irish!} 11:11, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

  The only source refered to in the last AfD was Top Web Games. Their directory entry is no good for WP:N. Marasmusine (talk) 12:57, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Marasmusine (talk) 12:58, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep The interview looks fine as a reliable source, but what's needed are reviews. Here's GameVortex's review and Jolt's review. There's quite possibly more out there, but that's enough for the evil triangle of GameplayDevelopmentReception. Someoneanother 01:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

  Thanks. Marasmusine (talk) 06:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

  • A pleasure, always. Someoneanother 07:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - Someone another's links indicate adequate notability. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 02:36, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.