Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Bailey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:32, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tony Bailey

Tony Bailey (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

The subject of the article does not seem to meet the primary notablity guideline or the specific guideline for people. There is no evidence of significant coverage by reliable sources independent of the subject. Guest9999 (talk) 14:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete fails WP:BIO no evidence of reliable third party coverage, google bring up nothing. Harland1 (t/c) 15:04, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete no assertion of notability ukexpat (talk) 15:08, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Tony Bailey is a notorious teacher at the Purbeck School, and an important member of The Vavreckas, so people should be able to learn about him! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocchoc153 (talk • contribs) 15:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete Sorry, fails WP:NOTE. Plus the article does nothing but promote the subject. PeterSymonds | talk 15:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:00, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable schoolteacher. Possible candidate for A7 speedy, as a school yearbook award is not much of an assertion of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:08, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails both WP:PROF and WP:BIO. Probably qualifies for speedy deletion as does the article The Vavreckas. Nsk92 (talk) 16:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete – no real assertion of notability. ... discospinster talk 17:10, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. It appears to be a vanity article.--Berig (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete -- seems like article by students -- unlikely to meet notability and would have to be rewritten from scratch even if he did. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 20:32, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete — per Discospinster. —paranomia (formerly tim.bounceback)a door? 00:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete No real assertion of notability, why wasn't this speedied? Edward321 (talk) 23:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.