Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Think This

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. --Coredesat 04:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Think This

Album (Closing admin: This is a procedural listing; please count me as neutral. BanyanTree 00:23, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - NN/V /Blaxthos 01:07, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable. Hello32020 01:57, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep, if the band is notable, and it has its own article, then so are their albums --Steve 02:37, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no, it's exactly the opposite; just because the band has an article doesn't mean every album needs one too. Since this is nothing but a track listing, there's not really anything to merge. Opabinia regalis 02:51, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete There is a sentence or two and the jacket photo that can be merged.Obina 09:17, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - May not be a band I have heard of but there are already a huge numnber of other articles similar to this one. Away_from_the_Sun, from the more reknowned band, 3 Doors Down, has about same amount of content but no AFD tag on it. I am sure there are alot of others that have similar content that are by more popular bands. The band does have an article, and that is one reason why I think we should keep it. If there was no band article, or no track listing, or even the info at the bottom for the band members and there positions leads me to a keep. Chris Kreider 13:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Agree with Chrislk02 and Steve, that the band has an article. There are also many many albums without citations. Cheers -- Imoeng 21:02, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. --badlydrawnjeff talk 10:51, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - It has a cover, a track listing, wiki links, and is clean and properly constructed. Hu 14:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• Merge surely. The Toxik article is not large, and could stand some material on their vast two album discography being added. The album articles are short too, basically just boring track listings. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.