Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telecom 2.0

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Telecom 2.0

Telecom 2.0 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Neologism 2.0 Artw 00:28, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete a marketing term used by one company isn't notable enough. Koweja 00:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. --Duke of Duchess Street 01:49, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete 2.0 ^BETA! - nn neologism, 589 ghits. MER-C 01:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. --Sopoforic 02:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete neologism Orderinchaos78 03:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a non-notable neologism. JIP | Talk 07:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. Alex43223 ^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail} 07:46, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 08:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete just a definition --Westmoreville 08:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete belongs more in a dictionary of neologisms than in Wikipedia. --MatthewUND^(talk) 09:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unsourced neologism.-- danntm ^T _C 19:40, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unsourced WP:NEO. Davidpdx 10:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable neologism.Akanksha 19:34, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete As above. Carpet9 00:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.