Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teenage Bestsellers 252
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:43, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Teenage Bestsellers 252
This was a contested {{prod}} (the objection came after the article had been deleted so I reinstated it and I'm bringing it here for consensus). RobertG ♬ talk 09:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, agree whole-heartedly with the editor who nominated it for {{prod}} - "if there is a notable porn compilation, this isn't it." --RobertG ♬ talk 09:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Rob 09:50, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 10:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 11:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I can't see from the article how the compilation is notable. (aeropagitica) 13:22, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per my original nom for {{prod}}. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Tove Jensen is a well known pornographic actrice and this compilation video is one of the few with her on the cover. Also this video was discussed on the discussion page of Tiny Tove because of the appearance of her and somone with the artist name Horny Rob. This guy has claimed he introduced Tove into the porn industry. The image of the video was no recovered but I will upload it again so the article is more complete. Ik.pas.aan 23:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- About the image, please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2006 March 3 where I nominated Image:Teenage Bestsellers 252.jpg for deletion, with reasons explained there. It should be deleted *regardless* of the outcome of this AFD. --Rob 23:56, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Ik, that might make an actual copy of the video a collector's item, but I doubt it would make the video itself an encyclopedically notable work. -- Antaeus Feldspar 01:00, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- If you say the video might be a collector's item that in itself means its worthy enough to be described on Wikipedia in my opinion. Does it really harm Wikipedia to let this article exist? Ik.pas.aan 11:03, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- No, that's exactly what I said it didn't do. Elvis Presley is at least five thousand times better-known than Tove Jensen, and a TV Guide with Presley on the cover might be a collector's item. Does this make that issue of TV Guide encyclopedically notable? No it does not. And yes it harms Wikipedia to let this article exist, because it becomes a precedent for future articles. "Well, Rear-Rammed Sluts 47 may just be one of a hundred porn videos that came out this month, but if this video which is nothing but a compilation of porn loops is notable, RRS47 must be too!" -- Antaeus Feldspar 21:33, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- I do not see whats wrong with having articles about less known movies, videos or compilations, porn or otherwise. If the article is written according to the rules commonly accepted on Wikipedia it is an addition to the encyclopedia. The article is there for people who are interested in reading about it. Since there is just a link to it from the article of Tove Jensen and the categories in the article itself I do think mostly people who are interested in seeing this article will read this. Whats wrong with that? Ik.pas.aan 20:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- No, that's exactly what I said it didn't do. Elvis Presley is at least five thousand times better-known than Tove Jensen, and a TV Guide with Presley on the cover might be a collector's item. Does this make that issue of TV Guide encyclopedically notable? No it does not. And yes it harms Wikipedia to let this article exist, because it becomes a precedent for future articles. "Well, Rear-Rammed Sluts 47 may just be one of a hundred porn videos that came out this month, but if this video which is nothing but a compilation of porn loops is notable, RRS47 must be too!" -- Antaeus Feldspar 21:33, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- If you say the video might be a collector's item that in itself means its worthy enough to be described on Wikipedia in my opinion. Does it really harm Wikipedia to let this article exist? Ik.pas.aan 11:03, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Tove Jensen is notable; this random compilation of porn loops (#252 in a series of...?) is definitely not. MCB 03:07, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. per MCB. Eivind 03:11, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 03:24, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, as per MCB. JeremyA 17:03, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, per MCB. --Calton | Talk 01:05, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
