Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Dynasty (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete due to the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Davewild (talk) 08:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Team Dynasty

Team Dynasty (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Incredibly difficult to find independent reliable sources for verification. I've tried rewriting it and sourcing it, but it's been pretty much impossible. Wafulz (talk) 16:36, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

• Keep It seems to have at least some notability through news coverage. It needs moved however; San Diego Dynasty would be more appropriate. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 18:36, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

• That's a redirect to Team Dynasty; they appear to have been old duplicate articles. The last version has a little information; merge the two. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 18:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

• Merge. Per Jeremy. Renee (talk) 22:55, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unless coverage in reliable sources is provided. They certainly sound notable from the article, but without any independent references, we don't have any proof of that. Terraxos (talk) 05:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 13:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 02:06, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per Terraxos Jmsloderbeck (talk) 02:46, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep with conditions if good sources can be found and the article is given a good cleanup then Keep, but if not Delete.  Atyndall93 | talk  03:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. No secondary sources. It has been tagged as needing sources since June 2007—how much more time do the keep advocates think it should get? Quale (talk) 05:09, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, a local San Diego paintball team, non-notable and not encyclopedic. KleenupKrew (talk) 09:02, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per above.--Berig (talk) 18:47, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:RS, WP:V and WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 03:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Article lacks context (is the team a member of a professional paintball league?). Verification seems almost impossible through independent sources (even the List of paintball leagues is a rack full of external links to each league - only the National Professional Paintball League has an article here). B.Wind (talk) 05:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.