Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sue Moorcroft
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 08:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sue Moorcroft
fails WP:BIO with one non-notable book, no awards, and no references found for claims of publishing in national media outlets - CobaltBlueTonyâ„¢ talk 14:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete one novel does not bestow notability. Dreamspy (talk) 15:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Thanks for listing here Cobaltbluetony. Currently the article presents no compelling notability, but if the journalism (or the novel) racked up RS coverage and someone adds it, I'd be happy to change my mind. --Dweller (talk) 15:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - NN. Search of NY Times and Google yielded nothing to establish N. KnightLago (talk) 15:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable. --Starionwolf (talk) 01:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

