Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stienski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete (A7/G11) —Xezbeth 21:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stienski

Stienski (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article about a musician who does not appear to be sufficiently notable. Fails WP:MUSIC. The notability tag has been in place since January 2007 and, judging from the edit history, it's quite possible that there's a conflict of interest as well. S ^up? 19:45, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per {{Db-band}}, possible copy vio too. No notability whatsoever. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 19:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - fails to assert notability as per WP:MUSIC; searches come up with nothing that I can see for reliable sources. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:06, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy per db-band. No articles to show notability, no refs in any of the major publications (Rolling Stone, AMG, Billboard). Appears to be another Myspace act.--Ispy1981 20:48, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Obviously, this doesn't pass WP:MUSIC by a long shot. But just in case that doesn't work, I'm going to have to go with Wikipedia:No one cares about your garage band. Trusilver 21:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - Tag with {{db-band}}. It definitly fails WP:MUSIC. Let's snowball this discussion. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (ταlκ) 21:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete already tagged Giggy _U^CP 21:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.