Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stacy White Cleaveland
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stacy White Cleaveland
Local actress working suburban Michigan. No notable roles -- stage, screen, or television -- noted, though she claims to have done the music and lyrics for an Afternoon Special. Calton | Talk 00:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as not notable, the Afternoon Special thing is redlink, which means NN. Shin'ou's TTV (Futaba|Masago|Kotobuki) 03:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, I'm assuming it's shorthand for those mildly cheesy TV dramas put out by ABC in the afternoon -- ABC Afterschool Specials, I think, was the official title -- aimed at imparting painless moral lessons for American teens. Oh no, Sarah's an alcoholic! Oh no, Bobby's being tempted to cheat on a test! Stuff like that. Non-notable individually, yes, though real. --Calton | Talk 04:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- A red link means the article doesn't exist. It has no relation to its notability. Notability should be determined from outside sources, not based on the existence of its Wikipedia article. - Mgm|(talk) 09:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Notability should NOT be affected by the fact that the nominator couldn't be bothered to check what he wikilinks to, and the name of the article is After school special --Roninbk t c # 15:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Considering the article you just linked to does not mention her means that the nominator mistyping the article title is irrelevent to this AFD. This does not affect the notability argument whatsoever. --67.68.153.192 21:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- The nominator DID check several spelling variations (and why aren't they redirects?) but since the existence or non-existence of an article of this type of TV show -- as the nominator clearly states in his clarification -- has bugger-all to do with the notability or non-notability of this subject, thought it was an utter waste of time to locate the EXACT spelling (assuming it existed), instead choosing to clarify what the damned things were. --Calton | Talk 22:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- The reason I pointed it out was because someone said "Oooh, red-link. That must mean non-notable," and I was pointing out the fallacy of the argument. I was not saying that she was responsible for the After school special, and this article up for deletion doesn't assert that either. What it asserts is that she worked on a production called "Billy" which is an "Afterschool Special" --Roninbk t c # 09:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- The nominator DID check several spelling variations (and why aren't they redirects?) but since the existence or non-existence of an article of this type of TV show -- as the nominator clearly states in his clarification -- has bugger-all to do with the notability or non-notability of this subject, thought it was an utter waste of time to locate the EXACT spelling (assuming it existed), instead choosing to clarify what the damned things were. --Calton | Talk 22:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Considering the article you just linked to does not mention her means that the nominator mistyping the article title is irrelevent to this AFD. This does not affect the notability argument whatsoever. --67.68.153.192 21:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Notability should NOT be affected by the fact that the nominator couldn't be bothered to check what he wikilinks to, and the name of the article is After school special --Roninbk t c # 15:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- A red link means the article doesn't exist. It has no relation to its notability. Notability should be determined from outside sources, not based on the existence of its Wikipedia article. - Mgm|(talk) 09:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BIO. Arbusto 03:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing notable recorded, and no real verification apart from her employers website. -- Beardo 05:00, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete No notable roles in any notable films. WP:NN, WP:V, WP:BIO all not met. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 11:30, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
