Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silver Flame

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cbrown1023 talk 23:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Silver Flame

A few months ago User:Gavin.collins raised the question as to whether or not this topic is notable enough for Wikipedia inclusion, and to be honest I'm not sure myself. As I read it, its just a fictional religion within a fictional role-playing game, with nothing impressive in the way of third party references. Rather than let the notability tag linger indefinitely I've opted to present this for community discussion. This is a procedural nomination, no !vote from me at this time although I may weigh in in the next few days. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 18:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete, fails WP:FICT. --Dhartung | Talk 18:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep referenced article. Catchpole (talk) 20:26, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 21:40, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - fails WP:FICT, as it asserts no notability through reliable verifiable sources independent of the topic. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 01:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Now that I have had the time to properly review the applicable WP:FICT guidelines I believe that this article fails it in every way. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 21:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete no independent sources; fails WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 14:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
• Merge with Religions of Eberron, although this may just shift the problem of lacking notability and not solve it. – sgeureka ^t•c 14:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.