Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiny ball syndrome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Shiny ball syndrome

Shiny ball syndrome (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This article is for a neologism or protologism and fails WP:V and WP:SET MarkBrooks 04:34, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Whatever we do with slang dictionary definitions: Not sure what that is, but I don't think they stay here, so delete. Ned Wilbury 04:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - smells of WP:NFT. MER-C 05:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Ckessler 05:15, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as protologism. Daniel Case 05:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. And [[WP:I'veneverheardofit]]. And it possesses debatable humour. Bubba hotep 14:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete It's actually got several blog hits but nothing else. Darkspots 15:56, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Even if it were a scientific theory (which I highly doubt it is), there is no research linking it, and I highly doubt that there's any in existence. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adam Riley (talk • contribs) 19:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC).
  • Delete It's a cute joke, but not encyclopedic. --Icarus (Hi!) 21:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, per—wait a minute, I've gotta take a look at the Centaur Art discussion, be right back. Dpbsmith (talk) 23:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day.--John Lake 18:58, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Neologism, no assertion of notability. —ShadowHalo 22:24, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.