Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheena Wilson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 07:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sheena Wilson
STRONG delete this was a VERY, VERY, VERY minor character who hasn't appeared for two years. Kogsquinge 01:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Merge into Neighbours or appropriate list as described in WP:FICT for minor character. The Rambling Man 15:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment it seems that every character ever to have been in Neighbours has their own article at List of Neighbours characters. The Rambling Man 15:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment I wonder what poor Zac Willis and Sally Upton did. Anyway, I think this is a case where a whole lot of merging needs to occur. GassyGuy 21:27, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep As pointed out above, all show characters have articles. TonyTheTiger 21:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, but will require better citation Television show character articles are normally ok, even for minor characters (and I noticed this character was supposedly on the show for five years, which sounds like a pretty good run). There is a problem, though, in that the article seems to be weak on references for verification purposes. I would suggest improving the references and expanding the information about the character to make it more than just a stub. If after a reasonable time no additional references are added and the article is not expanded, I'd be more inclined to reconsider and suggestion deletion. Dugwiki 23:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. It needs better sources. Might be better placed in List of Neighbours characters if not sufficient references. Capitalistroadster 00:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 00:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Minor characters in television shows are almost never notable enough for an article. Without any sources that show notability this stub definitely needs to go. And in response to an argument made above, the fact that articles exist for other minor characters of this show does not, in any way, imply that this should be kept. In fact, it implies that those articles should also be nominated for deletion. --The Way 06:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --MaNeMeBasat 17:08, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- DELETE There are very few "fictional characters" that should be listed in an encyclopedia and this isn't one of 'em! Dwain 00:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
