Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex and Beauty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sex and Beauty

Sex and Beauty (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

This article appears to be nothing but non-neutral original research, and is not in the least bit encyclopedic.I feel like a tourist (talk) 03:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete WP:OR/ This is a bit of an essay, rather than an article. I declined speedy to prod in hopes that it could be saved. Looking at it again, i'm afraid i don't see that there is an article here. Dlohcierekim 03:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete WP:OR.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 04:48, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, hopeless and unsalvageable essay. --Dhartung | Talk 06:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, Horribly written essay. Original Research and nothing else. Electricbassguy (talk) 07:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

• Yeah, I tried to speedy this last night, but I guess I tagged it wrong (I'm still learning the ropes around here). An admin. told me that this was not a candidate for speedy because original research is not valid criteria for speedy deletion. The admin was correct, I guess it was my fault, but I felt there were many other reasons why this article definitely deserved speedy deletion. Anyway, that's how we ended up here. I feel like a tourist (talk) 15:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per above.--Berig (talk) 07:23, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete' - Original research, appropriate for a blog maybe Francium12 (talk) 08:59, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per above Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - As per previous comments.

• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 13:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ArcAngel (talk) 15:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:PERNOM. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 16:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. A great piece of art, a great writing, but has nothing to do with anything with "encyclo" or "pedia" in its name. :-) --NetRolller 3D 17:14, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete original research --Dalgspleh (talk) 18:50, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.