Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Jackson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:13, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Seth Jackson

Seth Jackson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A non-notable person described by an unreferenced article (other than a myspace link) that makes assertions of notability by referencing other notable people. A dated prod has been removed by the author with no improvement to the article. Mendors 00:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 01:07, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Delete -- unsourced, probably original research. -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 03:15, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. The myspace link doesn't work, and wouldn't be acceptable anyway, and the article is written in a far from neutral tone. As always, I will reconsider my position if the article is cleaned up and sourced.-gadfium 03:57, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete "Seth Jackson aka Beth Jackson"? A Google search for ""Seth Jackson" New Zealand" turns up nothing relevant whatsoever. I'm calling a hoax. fuzzy510 07:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete google searches for "Seth Jackson" along with any of the apparently-notable subjects the article suggests he is associated with turn up one hit exactly: this article. Probable hoax. JulesH 11:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per my prod reasoning: looks like a non-notable blogger, unsourced, written in a very positive light, no relevant Ghits, etc Melsaran 12:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, utterly nonnotable, no reliable sources. NawlinWiki 14:52, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, sounds like a load of bollocks: 'helped pass anti-smacking bill despite not being an MP, freed Ahmed Zouai...' *cough* sure you did. --Helenalex 22:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Looks like a hoax. No reliable sources. --Ace of Swords 19:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.