Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Ludlam
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Scott Ludlam
Not notable green candidate using Wikipedia as a soapbox. He is the "leading Green candidate" for Western Australia's Senate seat. Google news archives gives 5 hits Green plus Scott Ludlum. 96 UNIQUE G hits, mostly blogs. I do not see significant news coverage. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 03:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete for now, with option to recreate without prejudice if he is elected. Burzmali 19:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 06:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Keb25 08:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete NN. Option to re-create if elected. Twenty Years 09:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete NN at present, and the article sounds like a CV due to the lack of available RS at this time. After the election later this year, where the Greens are quite likely to displace the Democrats, he may well be a Senator and worthy of an article. Orderinchaos 01:41, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:N. It's also pretty much a copyvio of http://www.safecom.org.au/wrd2007.htm. -- But|seriously|folks 21:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, he isn't a notable figure right now, if elected I'd be happy to help recreate the article. Sebi [talk] 23:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
