Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Paul Republican

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 03:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ron Paul Republican

Ron Paul Republican (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unnotable protologism per WP:NEO, with original research issues. As the article notes, "Thomas DiLorenzo at LewRockwell.com coined the term for Professor Murray Sabrin, whos (sic) is running for for US Senate from New Jersey, on January 15th 2008." I don't think even truthiness became notable in 5 days. The article also appears to be a directory for US Congress candidates that have the same political platform, but Wikipedia is not a directory. hateless 05:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. Neologism and original research. Basically every notable politician gets factions named after them like this anyways. Alternately, could redirect to Political views of Ron Paul. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism, yet another attempt by Paul's rabid followers to promote him in any way possible. Next: Ron Paul condoms. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 06:12, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

• Please try to assume good faith and avoid personal attacks, especially with newcomers. --Explodicle (talk) 21:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per Realkyhick Doc Strange (talk) 09:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Mh29255 (talk) 14:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete; unverifiable, no reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Ron Paulcruft. *** Crotalus *** 14:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Explodicle (talk) 21:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• Strong delete per nom.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 00:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Yahel Guhan 06:24, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - per OR. miranda 06:25, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO. EJF (talk) 16:49, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
• Comment isn't this in a more generalized sense, a libertarian? 132.205.44.5 (talk) 23:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, yet more Ronpaulinalia. WP:NEO and all that. Lankiveil ^{(complaints | disco)} 03:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.