Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron's Org

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — TKD::Talk 07:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ron's Org

Ron's Org (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Notability not asserted for this non-notable club/group that would probably qualify as a speedy under db-group. Gets 266 unique G-hits, mostly mirror sites and personal pages. Those 266 hits are not even all about the same group - there are apparently multiple tiny groups using this same name. If starting one's own "splinter study group" to study Scientology away from the Church of Scientology makes one notable, we could all start our own tomorrow. wikipediatrix 01:20, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete cult-cruft. There is no notability asserted, therefore, this is subject to CSD-A7. Argyriou (talk) 02:02, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete CSD-A7. Oysterguitarist 02:55, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. --Leocomix 09:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipediatrix perhaps misunderstands the situation. Ron's Org is an association of groups, but the groups are subject to rules for admission and can be expelled. It is 'notable' within Scientology being the largest grouping outside the Church and the Wikipedia pages on Scientology would be incomplete without covering it, whether that justifies it having a separate page rather than incorporating mention of it into the Freezone article is what in effect being debated here. At present I think not. --Hartley Patterson 16:40, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
• Merge into the Free_Zone_(Scientology) article. This group is notable in Europe.--Fahrenheit451 00:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 20:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.