Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Allen Mukes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 06:54, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Allen Mukes

Robert Allen Mukes (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Looking at his IMDb resume, I think this guy is on the edge of notability. My casual search didn't find WP:RS or WP:V sources so I think probably no but others may think differently. Pigman 19:07, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete. Per nom, on the edge of notability (small role in House of 1000 Corpses) but there's not enough independent sources to sustain a bio at this time.--Sethacus 19:34, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep. He has many roles on IMBD, and his rating is above the 20,000, which means he does have notability. However, the article is too vague, and needs serious editing.--TGreenburgPR
  • Delete Not notable unless he was well known in the film community for his movies.Mbisanz 02:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep. Notable per many roles and 772 Ghits [1], but this violates WP:BLP as not having sufficient sourcing. Rescue? Bearian 17:32, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Obviously the article needs work, but someone with an IMDB resume like that is plainly encyclopedic. Kestenbaum 01:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kubigula (talk) 02:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - according to his website, he played professional basketball in the US and Europe - if this can be verified, he would be notable for that. Hal peridol 03:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep: Needs a lot of work, but seems notable. No reason to delete. - Rjd0060 03:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.