Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proximity bias

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Cbrown1023 talk 00:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Proximity bias

Proximity bias (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article has been transwikied to Wikitonary and no longer belongs in Wikipedia. Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 11:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete unless article rewritten... not a useful WP article in present form, and has been transwiki'd. --W.marsh 14:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This should not pose any controversy. YechielMan 16:55, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep and stubbify. This looks to me like it could be a legitimate topic, even if what is there at the moment is not very good. semper fictilis 18:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, at the moment it isn't very good - but I don't think deletion is the answer to that problem. It is in my opinion a legitimate topic that would warrant an article, even if it is only a stub at the moment. THE KING 08:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
  • It would be nice if someone would bother to write that stub at some point, but that doesn't seem to be happening... as is, this article's content has been transwiki'd and could be replaced by a {{wi}} if nothing else. --W.marsh 01:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - article seems to be taken from Testosterone magazine, and its use seems to be more as a buzzword for fitness gurus than for psychologists etc. Smmurphy^(Talk) 00:06, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.