Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principe de Sayd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 06:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Principe de Sayd

Principe de Sayd (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Another in a line of articles on alleged titles of Maltese nobility created by User:Tancarville (see discussion here). While the article has been in substantively the same form since 2005, actual published sources (unavailable to Wikipedia editors) were only added last year, and the sources upon which this article was actually based are the creator's own website and "unpublished research papers." A major WP:COI and WP:COATRACK issue crops up in that the alleged holders of this title is the creator's own family and the alleged current claimant is the creator's father, whose own personal article is up for AfD. Fails WP:V, WP:RS, WP:OR, WP:COI.  RGTraynor  13:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete per RGTraynor. Also it should be noted that it seems like an essay. Ijanderson977 (talk) 13:54, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. andy (talk) 15:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Per WP:RS, WP:N, WP:V, WP:OR. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:23, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Should have been deleted in August 2006. Quale (talk) 16:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:PERNOM. coccyx bloccyx(toccyx) 17:46, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Thinly veiled vanity article that fails verifiability. Charles 19:17, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Nehha (as they say in Malta -- though they also say Delete). The lack of notability is fairly obvious. Ecoleetage (talk) 21:00, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.