Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ponetivity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snowball delete `'Míkka>t 16:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ponetivity

Ponetivity (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:RS. No hint in google books [1]. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 11:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

I've heard it somewhere, but perhaps I'd write it as a neologism in wiktionary instead. With goodness in mind (talk) 11:07, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete No reliable source. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 12:33, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. No sources and no mention anywhere. Google search returns only one hit, to the WP entry[2]. Looks like may be a hoax article. Nsk92 (talk) 13:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete From the land of jokes that are funny only person telling the joke. Mandsford (talk) 00:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Zero Google results. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 05:48, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete In addition I have prodded both positivity and negativity since they both comprise of only one sentence claiming they are forms of "ponetivity" L'Aquatique[talk] 22:34, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.