Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Little

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 23:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Paul Little

Paul Little (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article does not assert notability. Google didn't turn up any sources, but there are many Paul Little's in the world, it seems. After deleting, move Paul Little (CEO) here. Lea (talk) 23:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

  • keep. Google turns up a fair amount, on one search string or another, on top of which he's been editor of two magazines with circulations in the tens of thousands. Turning this into a disambiguation page, with the subject moved to Paul Little (writer) might work. --Paularblaster (talk) 21:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
    • I see mostly articles he has written on Google, which doesn't make him notable. I don't know if having been the editor of two magazines makes him notable; I'd rather say not, but I'm not entirely sure. Did you find any third-party sources about him that might establish notability? -- Lea (talk) 04:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete needs references, third-party citations to verify standards of WP:BIO.--Sallicio\color{Red} \oplus 06:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 00:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak keep as editor of two major magazines, which I think barely meets WP:BIO for creative professionals. There is probably more written about him than is online. Absolutely move to Paul Little (writer) and make this a disambiguation page, although Paul Little (CEO) gets the lion's share of Google News Archive hits (roughly 1700 of 4200). That isn't a majority, though, and there's a large chunk of the globe in which he's a nobody. --Dhartung | Talk 05:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:BLP - completely unsourced, and no assertion or proof of notability. Bearian (talk) 19:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - non-notable writer, unsourced; the mags he's edited do not qualify as "major" by any means, Dhartung. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete As per Bearian.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:54, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.