Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PDF Sign&Seal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as article does not verify notability. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] PDF Sign&Seal

PDF Sign&Seal (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Does not establish WP:Notability via independent reliable sources that are not blogs, downloads & the like. Note that it was originally speedied; an editor removed some of the spam content, but it still reads like advert. Pgagnon999 (talk) 17:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable, advert. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 21:02, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable, advertising..--Camaeron (talk) 21:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

• Don't Delete, Text is much improved now. See external links (specially Adobe Security Partner Community link) which are notable and should be enough to make the text credible.Mwahaj (talk) 06:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

• Credibility isn't the issue, notability is. None of these links are independent reviews, which would be necessary to establish notability. --Pgagnon999 (talk) 04:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable, I tried to find independent sources to assert the notability of software, but I failed. Carlosguitar ^{(ready and willing)} 08:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as advertising. Snthdiueoa (talk) 13:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.