Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Side Kings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --Daniel Olsen 03:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] North Side Kings

North Side Kings (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable aside from Danzig story..I would usually speedy delete this, but the article is sort of pathetic and funny..fist fighting with Danzig is normal and no longer notable :) Missvain 05:08, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

• Do not delete, I was very happy to find it here. I think, it does matter for Glenn's career.
• Delete per nom. Mishatx 05:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete if their only claim to fame is a fist fight back stage on youtube then they can go. James086 ^{Talk | Contribs} 05:48, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Glen Danzig is pushy, big freakin' deal. --Dennisthe2 07:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom... pathetic in a pathetic sort of way. SkierRMH 08:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - tagged for speedy (not by me). MER-C 10:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 10:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
• Don't delete: Have been usefull for me. An european collectionist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.14.129.42 (talk • contribs)
• Delete - Per WP:V (A Youtube video?Yeah, right) and WP:NOT a collection of information that european collectionists find useful. --Elaragirl^Talk|Count 17:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, absolutely non-notable and unverifiable. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.