Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naruto--Biography

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted as a copyvio. I'm going to presume that the ArbCom injunction is not intended to prevent deletion of those. Seraphimblade Talk to me 10:41, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Naruto--Biography

Naruto--Biography (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Found this while sorting through uncat pages. This is an expanded fictional biography of Naruto Uzumaki which has no sources, unwikified and has some OR. It is also redundant to the more comprehensive discussion in the character's article. Not feasible as a redirect. Lenticel (talk) 22:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. Unverified original research on an anime character that already has his own comprehensive article on Wikipedia. As nom mentioned, no redirect as it's unlikely anyone will search for the topic using the title "Naruto--Biography".--TBC!?! 22:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Exterminate per above. MixItUp 23:59, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete This so blatantly violates WP:NOT#PLOT that it's making me cross-eyed. Oh wait, thats form all of the listas sorting. >_< But we already have an article on Naruto Uzumaki so the ArbCom injunction doesn't apply here. It also appears that his has created similar articles on other character which have already been speedy deleted. --Farix (Talk) 00:55, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete with extreme prejudice and rapidity. Horrendous WP:PLOT, and as we already have Naruto Uzumaki that's heading for GA, I would certainly hope that injunction doesn't apply. Collectonian (talk) 01:21, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Don't think it qualifies as speedy, but it's got big plotty issues, hella unsourcing, and we've already got an article that doesn't need a spinoff. I suspect given the duplication, this would count as housekeeping and so not under the ArbCom injunciton. —Quasirandom (talk) 03:15, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Redundant to the main article about Naruto (the character) and the idea of an article about a ficitonal character's bio is contrary to what Wikipedia is not, nevermind the style guideline on writing about fiction. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 05:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as per above; redundant, fails WP:PLOT, etc. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:48, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

This is a copyvio from here. I'm tagging it for speedy. Hazillow (talk) 07:43, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.