Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystic projection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Kurykh 00:57, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mystic projection

Mystic projection (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

delete - this seems to be a POV fork/synthesis of a number of articles. There is no citation for the use of the phrase Mystic projection, which does not seem to be different than Astral projection. In any case, most of the article does not seem to be on the topic of the title but rather a POV history of Mysticism along with short bio-stubs of a number of mystics. All these topics are covered better elsewhere. GlassFET 21:56, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - The article has no independent references, and composed of WP:OR. This leads me to believe that the article also probably does not adhere to WP:NPOV. Definite delete. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (ταlκ) 22:37, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:V. All ghits are wp mirrors. Giggy UCP 23:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and merge with, or redirect to, Astral projection. Bearian 02:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge whatever is different into Astral projection, as per Bearian and then delete. I'll admit that I don't know enough about astral projection or mystic projection to know whether there is much of a distinction, but the author writes that "Mystic Projection is an ancient term which precedes the contemporary term astral projection". The "ancient term" part is what we would refer to in the most basic Anglo-Saxon words, as "bulla-scytten". English doesn't have "ancient terms". Chaucer didn't write about "Ye Olde Mystick Projecktion". If this article is equally accurate, I say delete. Mandsford 01:29, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.