Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mode magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 14:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mode magazine

Mode magazine (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Original research about fictional magazine. The first line of the article seems to indicate that there was at some point a magazine with that name, in which case this should be replaced by some stub on the subject. Otherwise, I don't really see why we would leave a redirect to Ugly Betty since this is an unlikely search term. Pichpich (talk) 18:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete is a fictional magazine on a TV show, doesn't seem encyclopedic to me and isn't notable. Hatmatbbat10Talk to me 19:35, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - anything relevant can be merged to Ugly Betty. Doesn't need an article on its own and wouldn't be useful as a redirect. JohnCD (talk) 19:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete or I could buy a redirect to the TV show as someone might think it is real and search for it. By itself it is not notable. -Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 20:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Mode (Ugly Betty) already redirects to the series. The title here isn't even right; it should be Mode (magazine), and this just seems to be fan observation about how the magazine is run on the show. Nate • (chatter) 22:16, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete or merge to Ugly Betty. Does not deserve its own article. JIP | Talk 06:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.