Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Golik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge with no prejudice to separation and restoration as a separate article given sufficient sourced content. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:00, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Matt Golik

Matt Golik (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

• Delete. Mayor of small town (~2000 people), not notable prior to reports of death WWGB (talk) 23:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Merge The merge will work with the main article. Chandlerjoeyross (talk) 14:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete 10 years? Hardly remarkable. Mangoe (talk) 23:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
• D NN dead mayor of a town of 2000, can't write a bio of this person from WP:RS -- Y not be working? 23:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Upon further consideration, I am also ok with slight merge into Wolf Point, Montana -- Y not be working? 23:49, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
    • OK, I feel that the merge would be a better decision. It wold work with the Government section. Chandlerjoeyross (talk) 00:10, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete or merge, but does not merit a standalone biography. Punkmorten (talk) 08:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
• Merge Surely this can be added to the main article. It certainly doesn't warrant it's own entry. Yorkie19 (talk)11.06 6 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Certainly seems to pass the criteria for politicians at WP:BIO. faithless (^speak) 05:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• weak keep Appears to meet WP:BIO, but might make more sense to merge to the article on the town if we don't have much info about him. JoshuaZ (talk) 00:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
• Merge per Yorkie19. There isn't enough information here to go on to warrant a separate article. More information can be added in the main article after all, then if it grows to more than about a paragraph with third party references, this separate article can always be reinstated. Snthdiueoa (talk) 13:16, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.