Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Meadows (California)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mark Meadows (California)

Mark Meadows (California) (discussion|history|protect|delete|undelete|logs|links)

Non-noteable, unpublished works, lack of citations, likely created by subject Ellpwd 15:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 00:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Delete — Doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO, and there's no verification of his claims to fame other than his own websites. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 00:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Yeah, anyone can sell anything on Amazon and not much notability despite taking some time to search things out. Missvain 01:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. WP:VANITY may come into play. --Czj 01:19, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 03:05, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete per Kungming2. P.B. Pilhet / Talk 03:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Poorly-sourced biography of a living person. I have proposed this be a speedy deletion criterion, because we cannot know if there is subtle mischief afoot. Sourced only from a work published by the subject, plus links to a self-promotion site, neither of which establish notability. Robert A.West (Talk) 07:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity, non-notable, and likely an ad. Spinach Dip 08:37, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete seems like a promo article and does not seem to meet WP:Bio standards... however his ghits do give results but I doubt they are enough to declare his notability.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 16:48, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.