Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie Slater

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 13:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Marie Slater

Marie Slater (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable brief existence on reality show. Notability does not come from fleeting TV appearances. Paste (talk) 17:17, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

SAVE THE ARTICLE. If 'fleeting TV appearances' do not cover notability then a large number of articles should then be nominated of which i could list MANY. Jeremy Speight had a very brief appearance of Airport and yet was given an article for that alone! Maz was notorious in the press and this was the start of the "nastys" popularity started at that time by "Nasty Nick" "Nasty Nigel" "Nasty Maz" and later Simon Cowell. The article includes an external link to an interview in which Maz states she has TV presenting roles planned in the future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KirstySutton (talk • contribs) 17:47, 19 April 2008 — KirstySutton (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 19:32, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 17:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

• Kirsty, please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and sign your posts by typing ~~~~. As much as I despise reality TV, this lady seems to be one of the more notable persons, so I !vote keep, per "notability is not temporary". The Dominator^Talk_Edits 18:37, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
• Keep as per notability guidelines and as per the fact that it has 4 good references and has good information. However, it would need to be cleaned up to make it a proper encyclopedic article. Razorflame 01:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. Article needs some expansion/cleanup, but the references and her being a regular on an entire series of a nationally-aired television program qualifies her in the notability department. B.Wind (talk) 04:51, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. Has suitable references. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.