Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie-Therese Emma Caraher Gilbert

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as failing WP:BIO, WP:BLP, WP:V, WP:N, and WP:RS. Bearian 23:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Marie-Therese Emma Caraher Gilbert

Marie-Therese Emma Caraher Gilbert (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable beauty pageant contestant, namely Mrs World (note not Miss World). Fails WP:BIO, no independent, reliable sources stated, and none are likely to be found given the very limited press coverage on her. Stu ’Bout ye! 13:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak Delete Questionable notability. JJL 14:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep — Notability depends on how you view the the Mrs. World competition. As 1st runner up, she would appear reasonably notable in that context. It is not unknown for beauty pagent winners to lose their standing and have the 1st runner up take the crown. So we should at least have some mention of the backup winner for world-wide contests. — RJH (talk) 19:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment. She still fails WP:BIO. The person must have been the subject of published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject, and more specifically, If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may need to be cited to establish notability. Stu ’Bout ye! 08:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
      • Two more added. I'm not sure about the accuracy of all the recent additions, however. But I think there may be a youTube interview somewhere... — RJH (talk) 22:50, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
    • She was runner-up for Mrs. Commonwealth, not Mrs. World. Here's an entertaining article on the Mrs. World contest, for which she and her husband were sources.[1] But I'm going to abstain on this one, though I'd be inclined to keep a national-level pageant winner if there were just more sources. --Groggy Dice T | C 16:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep— When Marie-Therese held her title of 1st runner up, she received substantial press coverage in both Northern Ireland and New Zealand. She was interviewed on national radio in both Northern Ireland and New Zealand and interviewed with her family on Television in New Zealand. Glamazon 11:37, 15 October 2007 (UTC)glamazonGlamazon 11:37, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:N and WP:BIO. --Sc straker 13:08, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.