Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnetofection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 16:27, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Magnetofection

Magnetofection (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This page is advertising, and Im pretty sure its fake. I work in a cell biology lab and have never heard of this. The article is of poor quality, and the science in the article is vague or just outright wrong. RogueNinja_talk 03:40, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions. —Espresso Addict 17:36, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. The current article is promotional in tone and needs major rewriting, but the technique appears real per several Medline hits in reasonable quality specialist journals, see eg [1] Espresso Addict 17:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, I've added references, formatted and re-written a little for tone. Tim Vickers 17:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep source seem adequate; I did some additional editing, and there's a good deal more still needed. DGG (talk) 03:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep per above. Cleanup is all that is needed. James Luftan ^contribs 17:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.