Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Tryl (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:52, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Luke Tryl

Luke_Tryl (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

This person does not (yet) deserve an encyclopedic entry. The only noteworthy thing he has done is described in the Oxford Union article already. Being a president of a student society is not very interesting per se. Delete this article. Especially the stupid bit about coming 10th in the country in A-level politics, I mean, who cares? —Preceding unsigned comment added by LeBofSportif (talk • contribs) 2008/06/03 11:50:08

Not sure why he'd deserve a page - he was President of a student society which has 3 Presidents a year and the only notable thing he did is extensively covered in the article on the Oxford Union. If a page was to be made for every President of the Oxford Union after they left office then we'd end up with a very unencyclopaedic list very quickly. Delete. 129.67.10.100 (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep He seems to be notable for his connection to the controversy. The above seem a bit like WP:IDONTLIKEIT. If the controversy falls within the "One Event" stuff though he probably doesn't meet the notability criteria. Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:13, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete. Seems a one-off controversy. ~ Antiselfpromotion (talk) 16:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak delete - BLP1E, just. Sceptre (talk) 18:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - Not notable yet. If we had a page for anyone who was at the centre of a minor controversy/short-lived news story, then we'd be creating reams and reams of new pages every week. The Griffin/Irving thing is covered in the Ox Union article anyway. Timmah48 (talk) 23:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.