Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil nims

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Lil nims

Lil nims (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable musician. User has contested Prod. Made some assertion of notability, so was not tagged. [1] and [2]. Subject fails WP:MUSIC. Also, WP:COI concern. Wisdom89 (T / C) 01:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. Article has no sources and no establisment of notability remotely close to WP:MUSIC guidelines. Were it not for the unsourced claim of a "contract with Uiversal Music Industries"(sic) it would be an A7 candidate. OlenWhitaker • talk to me or don't • ♣ ♥ ♠ ♦ 01:21, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. I see no assertion of notability. Only crystal ballery. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 02:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Delete per above --Lemmey talk 04:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. No sources, no reliable Ghits, little assertion of notability. nneonneo talk 04:45, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. Non-notable. Titanium Dragon (talk) 07:11, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:MUSIC.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 08:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as not notable.--Berig (talk) 09:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete - Fails inclusion criteria. asenine t/c\r (fc: f2abr04) 12:58, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.