Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libby Folfax

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all except for Cindy Vortex, which will be kept. east.718 at 03:07, December 1, 2007

[edit] Libby Folfax

Libby Folfax (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Nick Dean (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Hugh Neutron (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Judy Neutron (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
UltraLord (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Cindy Vortex (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
Eustace Strytch (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

– (View log) These supporting characters do not satisfy the notability guideline for fiction and unlikely to do so at any point in time. Already on List of The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron: Boy Genius characters. « ₣ullMetal ₣alcon » 23:31, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete all, non-notable characters, covered already in the main character list. Not notable enough for their own pages. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Hugh Neutron, Judy Neutron, and Cindy Vortex. Delete the rest. Hugh and Judy Neutron are the parents of the main character and appear in almost every episode. Cindy is a no-question keep. She is the antagonist of the show and is always picking on Jimmy. Besides Jimmy himself, she is probably the most seen character in the showFrank Anchor (talk) 01:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  • That argument has nothing to do with Frank's point. Scooter3230 (talk) 20:02, 26 November 2007
  • Delete all as per nom. RMHED (talk) 01:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all per nom. Collectonian (talk) 15:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 13:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all. They already have a more than elaborate coverage in the character list that the nom mentioned. – sgeureka t•c 13:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  • This is exactly why the characters, especially Vortex, should have their own page. Scooter3230 (talk) 17:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. —Hiding T 13:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep all as they seem to be inherently notable characters of a recognizable nature. Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 17:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all per nomination. Wikipedia simply isn't a guide to every character in every show. RobJ1981 (talk) 17:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Vortex only per Frank Anchor and a Google search that brought up over 30,000 results, the second highest for any character on the show including those not nominated. Also the inclusion of Vortex in this nom is borderline WP:ALLORNOTHING The rest should be deleted or redirected to a minor character list per nom. Scooter3230 (talk) 20:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions. —Gavin Collins (talk) 08:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all as these articles have no primary or secondary sources and fail WP:NOT#PLOT and WP:FICT. --Gavin Collins (talk) 08:03, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all as per WP:NOT#PLOT and WP:FICT. --Fredrick day (talk) 22:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per lack of notability, references and general cruftiness. Biruitorul (talk) 02:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Vortex only per Frank Anchor. Also, her article passes WP:FICT because there are reliable secondary sources such as the results on a Google search for "Cindy Vortex." Clearly passes WP:N and WP:V <Baseballfan789 (talk) 02:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Agreed, According to WP:FICTTopics within a fictional universe are notable if they have received substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources. Cindy Vortex absolutely hasFrank Anchor (talk) 00:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Transwiki, since there seems to be something here that someone else might be able to use, but they shouldn't be here on Wikipedia. -- Ned Scott 05:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: They are the parents, so they need their own article. She is the antagonist, so she needs her own article. Is there anything outside of plot for why this should be so? Yet, despite of all the Google searches and secondary sources not being used, not a single article provide any significant real-world context, its just one paragraph of plot after another. There is also a ton of plot-exclusive information on each of the characters in the list itself. If there cannot be something regarding character development, impact on the real-world, anything besides just plot in the list, then how on earth can they possibly not be deleted for have individual articles? I do not know how I missed Goddard, Carl Wheezer and Sheen Estevez, but if Vortex is deleted those do not even have a snowball's chance in hell. « ₣ullMetal ₣alcon » 21:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.