Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legal Direct

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 21:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Legal Direct

Advertising for a fledgeling company. Dismas|^(talk) 12:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

I disagree, this article is not so much that the company, but once i finish writing it, will be more about the new concept of this law firm, it is something that has never before been done by a UK law firm due to Law Society restrictions (The.griffter 13:04, 12 April 2006 (UTC))

• • As said below, if the article is going to be about the changes in the law, make it about the changes, not the company. Dismas|^(talk) 13:10, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Advertising. The company started up last month, so it can hardly be notable as-yet.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  13:05, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 13:06, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn company. If this concept truly is revolutionary and notable, than make an article for it, not for the company that hopes to make millions from it. Lankiveil 13:09, 12 April 2006 (UTC).
• Delete, nn company, ad. --Terence Ong 15:23, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.