Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kublai Khan's Lost Fleet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was REDIRECT. Cbrown1023 23:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kublai Khan's Lost Fleet

Kublai_Khan's_Lost_Fleet (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Orphaned stub, the topic is fully covered in Mongol invasions of Japan Kmorozov 11:20, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 17:47, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Better delete. No need to duplicate stuff where it is not needed. --Ghirla -трёп- 18:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Mongol invasions of Japan -- Whpq 22:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect per Whpq. Phrase seems to have non-trivial use per Google. --Dhartung | Talk 22:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Ugxq 08:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • A redirect could have been made without an AFD discussion. --Kunzite 13:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree on delete the content of this article is also mentioned in Kublai Khan. This should be merged & deleted with this and the Mongol invasions article. Minnaert 17:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment merge and delete is a violation of the GFDL. We need to keep the article history if there is to be a merge. Deletion gets rid of the history. --Kunzite 21:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep if expanded. This is actually a rather notable historical event/fleet which had some important consequences which merit its having its own article. However, as it stands now the article doesn't really reflect that; it certainly needs expansion from someone more knowledgeable about that topic than I. Since it is verified and notable, however, it shouldn't be deleted even though, as it stands now, it is little more than a repeat of information available elsewhere. --The Way 06:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect per Whpq and Dhartung. If enough material is found later, it can be recreated later. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:36, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.