Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kezef the Chaos Hound

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete both --Stephen 00:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Kezef the Chaos Hound

Kezef the Chaos Hound (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Very minor character from the Dungeons & Dragons universe, appearing in one redlink sourcebook. No evidence of third party coverage. J Milburn (talk) 14:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I am also bundling Dendar the Night Serpent with this nomination- another character from the same source book. J Milburn (talk) 15:09, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. —Pixelface (talk) 14:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Weak Keep, or Merge and/or Redirect into Faerun. BOZ (talk) 16:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment - Also, it would have made sense to bundle Ityak-Ortheel with these as well. BOZ (talk) 14:32, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletions. --Gavin Collins (talk) 18:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - maybe make note in the Fenrir article as modern adaptation if this origin can be proven. shadzar|Talk|contribs 18:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Comment: as for the newly added Serpent i say delete it as above, but if can be proven then stick a mention of it in a pop culture area on the Midgard Serpent page as i suggested the hound to Fenrir page.shadzar talk 21:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Both — non-notable. The Fenrir origin is uncited, so ignore. Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete both No secondary sources, no assertion of notability. Fails WP:RPG/N and WP:N. Percy Snoodle (talk) 10:45, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Call up the Gods of Brutal Cunning and Cunning Brutality to wipe 'em out. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v :L10 Lucario Cleric of Mew)} 22:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Kezef has appeared in multiple sourcebooks, as well as at least one novel that I recall. Additionally, the Fenris allusion is blatantly obvious, if currently uncited.Shemeska (talk) 02:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete This is just one of thousands of non-notable stock characters with no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability outside D&D canon. --Gavin Collins (talk) 14:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Out of curiosity Gavin, are you actually reading each of the articles that you're voting to delete? Because you've been using the same cut'n'pasted stock deletion reason on many of them.Shemeska (talk) 20:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

A reasoned rationale for deleting is still a reasoned rationale for deleting, and to be fair to him, I'd prefer he use c&p'd responses as he has demonstrated a very outdated knowledge of Dungeons & Dragons. -Jéské ^{(v^_^v :L13 ½-Raichu Soulknife)} 22:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Not so much outdated, as incomplete/inaccurate. Outdated would imply that he has had previous knowledge of the subject which did not change as the subject changed; this would seem to conflict with my observations of Gavin's responses. Oh yeah, Shemeska, "stock deletion reason", that was a good one - does that make the reasons non-notable? BOZ (talk) 23:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

• delete - what Gavin Collins said. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 21:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Both, both minor characters with no notability outside of D&D. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.