Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelley t hood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, WP:CSD#G3. east.718 at 17:26, 11/3/2007

[edit] Kelley t hood

Kelley t hood (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The subject of this article is not verifiable since it has no sources nor can sources be found. Seems to be a hoax. --Hdt83 ^Chat 05:31, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Likely hoax on its face value. I have a hard time believing that ANY civil war General doesn't already have an article here (there weren't that many General officers in EITHER army during the war.) Interestingly, I turned up a John Bell Hood that appears to MAYBE be the general this article is refering to, however this may be a coincidence and this article is likely total bullshit. Just in the interest of due dilligence, a google seach turns up bubkiss. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 06:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, impossible for man to have existed with all records lost, as they must have been if he's real and nothing's to be found. Nyttend 13:24, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Snowball delete, obviously. No point in wasting our time over this.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, utter WP:BALLS. Hedging a bet on a vandalism speedy. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 15:27, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete a hoax, obviously. TGreenburgPR 15:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.