Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José-María Siles
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 09:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] José-María Siles
I'm sysop at gl.wp, and we have found a conflict of interests on the article gl:José María Siles. We have deleted it there, but the strategy includes cross-wiking and sockpuppets, so I am afraid that's a common problem for many wikipedias concerning articles about José María Siles. Probably, problem goes further than simple deletion.
See Talk:José-María Siles in order to read all the evidences (not all, but most of them). --Xabier Cid (talk) 12:29, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Not to be deleted Searched in google.com a couple of minutes ago: Results 1 - 10 of about 1,180 for "jose-maria siles". (0.05 seconds). Enough reasons to keep the article José-María Siles on en.wp. Siles is a very well known journalist in Europe. --AYZ 14:02, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment A high number of Google hits doesn't establish notability. // Townlake (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- You're right, Townlake But we always look for references to analyze before taking a decision. // AYZ (talk) 14:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.59.249.130 (talk)
- Comment A high number of Google hits doesn't establish notability. // Townlake (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Don't forget to sign your posts the proper way, please (i.e., don't just copy-paste someone else's sig and substitute it with your own name). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 14:21, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Everything suggests that there is promotion (or self-promotion). --Arco de Rayne (talk) 15:00, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. I guess this is a perfect case of conflict of interest. To assesse the relevance is pointless: we have to take into account the deliberate promotion of a career, using different sockpuppets, on several wikipedias (en., de., fr., es., gl., ast...). By the way, User:AYZ is one of the users created in order to promote this CV, as it is easy to check on here. --Xabier Cid (talk) 15:46, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:46, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Just another non-notable journeyman journalist who hasn't even published a book. Fails WP:BIO, WP:N, WP:BK, etc. etc. Qworty (talk) 23:58, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Although he may claim some notability in Spain, I don't think it's notable enough to be included in the English Wikipedia. Even if kept, a full rework is needed, since none of the provided external links provides the information included in the article (it's sensible since it's Siles itself, or a close friend or relative, the one that has written down the biography). --Ecemaml (talk) 16:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
