Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John D'Agata 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:36, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] John D'Agata

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John D'Agata (April 2006).

My apologies for the relist, but honestly I fail to see how this subject meets our WP:PROF criteria for notability, the entire thing reads like a scaled down résumé. RFerreira 01:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete about 987 Ghits for "John D'Agata" do not appear notable.--Jusjih 01:14, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. (edit conflict) You don't need to apologize, I agree. It seems to fail WP:PROFTEST. Alphachimp ^talk 01:14, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn AdamBiswanger1 01:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not enough published yet. Dlyons493 Talk 02:44, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:PROF -- Alias Flood 03:37, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, doesn't meet WP:PROF. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:59, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per WP:PROF again. — ዮም (Yom) | contribs • Talk • E
• Delete per nom Michael 07:05, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete generic professor. Just zis Guy you know? 10:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Also, your name is oddly appropriate in that comment, JzG --PresN 21:20, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.